Archive for the 'Sports' Category

Page 3 of 4

Fox Baseball Sucks

Fox has the Yankees-Red Sox game today. Jeanne Zelasko has a different haircut, just like every year. You just know that there are a couple Fox executives somewhere deciding what her hair should look like.

But really almost everything about Fox’s baseball coverage sucks. Kevin Kennedy is scary. Tim McCarver is freaking old. Joe Buck is okay. I like the graphics. But the music is a little over-the-top. And if I see that talking baseball explaining a slider to me one more time I’m going to yack.

MLB Playoff Odds II

So I re-ran the odds after tonight’s games. In case you didn’t hear, the Red Sox beat the Yankees (crap), and the White Sox beat the Indians (ehh … good I guess, because although I was hoping the Indians would beat out the Red Sox for the Wild Card, I suddenly need to worry about the Yankees beating out the Indians …). Here’s the update:

NYY BOS CHI CLE NYY BOS CHI CLE
96-66 94-68 99-63 93-69 NYY wins ALE; BOS wins WC 1 1 1 0
96-66 94-68 98-64 94-68 NYY wins ALE; 1GP CLE@BOS 1 0.5 1 0.5
96-66 94-68 97-65 95-67 NYY wins ALE; CLE wins WC 1 0 1 1
95-67 95-67 99-63 93-69 NYY wins ALE; BOS wins WC 1 1 1 0
95-67 95-67 98-64 94-68 NYY wins ALE; BOS wins WC 1 1 1 0
95-67 95-67 97-65 95-67 1GP BOS@NYY; 1GP NYY@CLE/CLE@BOS 0.75 0.75 1 0.5
94-68 96-66 99-63 93-69 BOS wins ALE; NYY wins WC 1 1 1 0
94-68 96-66 98-64 94-68 BOS wins ALE; 1GP NYY@CLE 0.5 1 1 0.5
94-68 96-66 97-65 95-67 BOS wins ALE; CLE wins WC 0 1 1 1
Out of 9: 7.25 7.25 9 3.5
Out of 100: 80.56 80.56 100.0 38.89

We’re now down to nine possible outcomes. The Yankee sweeps and Indian sweeps are gone.

Obviously the most surprising change is that the even though the Yankees lost, their odds of making the playoffs are essentially unchanged — increased by less than one percentage point. What it translates to is that the Yankees had one throw-away game. And they’ve used it. No more.

The next surprising thing is not that the Indians’ odds have dropped, but the fact that they’ve dropped so much. Their odds went down by more than 23 percentage points. It’s one game — why are their odds hurt so much? The answer is that before tonight’s games, the Indians were competing with one team for the Wild Card: Boston. Now the Indians are competing with both the Yankees and the Red Sox. Had the Yankees won tonight, they would have had greater than a 97% percent chance of getting in, and the Red Sox and Indians would have been nearly tied around 50% each. (In fact, the Indians would have had exactly 50%, and the Red Sox would have had 50% plus the leftover 2½% or so that the Yankees had not yet sewed up.)

Because the Indians had been competing only with the Red Sox, they would have benefitted most from a Yankees sweep of the Red Sox.

Incredibly, all three teams still control their own destiny. If the Yankees or Red Sox win the next two games, they would win the AL East. If the Indians win the next two against the White Sox, the worst they can be left with is the “nightmare scenario,” and a one game playoff against the loser of the Yankees-Red Sox one game playoff.

If the White Sox sweep the Indians, then both the Yankees and Red Sox are guaranteed spots in the playoffs. Should this happen, the Yankees have a slight advantage over the Red Sox, for the same reason that they White Sox have already clinched the AL Central: Should two teams tie for their division, but both are guaranteed playoff spots, the head-to-head record is used as a tiebreaker, rather than a one-game playoff. The Yankees currently have a 9-8 lead against the Red Sox. If they split the next two, the Yankees would have 10-9 edge, and the division crown.

MLB Playoff Odds

The Yankees have an 80% chance of making the playoffs. The Indians have a 62.5% chance. And the Red Sox have a 58% chance.

There are sixteen possible outcomes after this weekend’s six games — three between the Yankees and the Red Sox and three between the White Sox and the Indians. You could say there are two possibilities in each of six games, which would be 2*2*2*2*2*2, or 64. But really, we only care about the outcome of each series. There are four possible outcomes of each series, meaning that we take 4*4, or 16. There are sixteen possible outcomes of this weekend. We could go further and talk about possible one game playoffs. Personally, I’m interested in which teams will make the playoffs. Further, I’m interested in what the odds are that each team will make the playoffs.

So what to do? Figure it out in Excel, then use Excel to create a table!

Below I show the sixteen possibilities for what the New York Yankees (NYY)’s, Boston Red Sox (BOS)’s, Chicago White Sox (CHI)’s, and Cleveland Indians (CLE)’s, respective records could be after this weekend. (Apologies for the ugliness.) To the right of those columns, I show what the playoff picture will be Monday morning. The final four columns show the odds, per each Monday morning playoff picture, that each team will make the playoffs. Note that in each scenario, the White Sox have 1 out of 1 odds of making the playoffs, because they have already secured the AL Central title.

About ⅔ of the way down, you’ll see the “nightmare scenario,” where MLB would have the first ever two-tiered one game playoff. Here, I have determined that the Yankees, for example, have a 50% chance of winning the first game. They also have a 50% chance of losing that game, meaning they would play the second game against the Indians, where they again have a 50% chance of winning. 50% * 50% = 25%. The 50% from the first game plus the 25% from the second game equals 75%. (Blah blah blah, etc etc etc.)

The last two rows show first, the odds out of 16 that each team will make the playoffs. The White Sox will make the playoffs 16 out of 16 times, because they have already locked up the AL Central. The final row shows each team’s odds out of 100. Enjoy.

NYY BOS CHI CLE NYY BOS CHI CLE
97-65 93-69 99-63 93-69 NYY wins ALE; 1GP CLE@BOS 1 0.5 1 0.5
97-65 93-69 98-64 94-68 NYY wins ALE; CLE wins WC 1 0 1 1
97-65 93-69 97-65 95-67 NYY wins ALE; CLE wins WC 1 0 1 1
97-65 93-69 96-66 96-66 NYY wins ALE; CLE wins WC 1 0 1 1
96-66 94-68 99-63 93-69 NYY wins ALE; BOS wins WC 1 1 1 0
96-66 94-68 98-64 94-68 NYY wins ALE; 1GP CLE@BOS 1 0.5 1 0.5
96-66 94-68 97-65 95-67 NYY wins ALE; CLE wins WC 1 0 1 1
96-66 94-68 96-66 96-66 NYY wins ALE; CLE wins WC 1 0 1 1
95-67 95-67 99-63 93-69 NYY wins ALE; BOS wins WC 1 1 1 0
95-67 95-67 98-64 94-68 NYY wins ALE; BOS wins WC 1 1 1 0
95-67 95-67 97-65 95-67 1GP BOS@NYY; 1GP NYY@CLE/CLE@BOS 0.75 0.75 1 0.5
95-67 95-67 96-66 96-66 1GP BOS@NYY; CLE wins WC 0.5 0.5 1 1
94-68 96-66 99-63 93-69 BOS wins ALE; NYY wins WC 1 1 1 0
94-68 96-66 98-64 94-68 BOS wins ALE; 1GP NYY@CLE 0.5 1 1 0.5
94-68 96-66 97-65 95-67 BOS wins ALE; CLE wins WC 0 1 1 1
94-68 96-66 96-66 96-66 BOS wins ALE; CLE wins WC 0 1 1 1
Out of 16: 12.75 9.25 16 10
Out of 100: 79.68 57.81 100.0 62.50

Pennant Race TV

Here are the crucial games so you can plan your weekend. I almost didn’t include NL games. I don’t know when it happened, but I just don’t care about the NL anymore.

I’ve read on ESPN.com that more games than indicated here may get airtime. If I find anything definite I’ll update this post. I might add the spreads, too.

Oh, and this is courtesy ESPN.com.

TEAMS TIME (ET) NAT TV PITCHERS
Thursday, September 29, 2005
Chicago Sox at Detroit 1:05 PM ESPN Garcia vs Grilli
NY Yankees at Baltimore 7:05 PM Small vs Bedard
Toronto at Boston 7:05 PM Downs vs Clement
Tampa Bay at Cleveland 7:05 PM Fossum vs Sabathia
Chicago Cubs at Houston 8:05 PM Rusch vs Rodriguez
Friday, September 30, 2005
NY Yankees at Boston 7:05 PM ESPN Wang vs Wells
Chicago Sox at Cleveland 7:05 PM Buehrle vs Millwood
Philadelphia at Washington 7:05 PM Brito vs Hernandez
Chicago Cubs at Houston 8:05 PM Zambrano vs Pettitte
Saturday, October 1, 2005
NY Yankees at Boston 1:15 PM FOX Johnson vs Wakefield
Chicago Sox at Cleveland 1:15 PM FOX Garland vs Westbrook
Chicago Cubs at Houston 4:05 PM FOX Williams vs Clemens
Philadelphia at Washington 4:05 PM FOX Myers vs Patterson
Sunday, October 2, 2005
Chicago Sox at Cleveland 1:05 PM McCarthy vs Elarton
Philadelphia at Washington 1:05 PM Lieber vs Carrasco
NY Yankees at Boston 2:05 PM Mussina vs Schilling
Chicago Cubs at Houston 2:05 PM Maddux vs Oswalt

ESPN.com: Blue?

Today ESPN.com‘s red bar at the top is … blue? Anyone know why? Is this permanent or temporary?

They should really do a front page redesign to reduce the clutter.

MLB.com Playoffs Ad

I just spotted this add banner on MLB.com:

MLB.com ad banner

I bring it to your attention because of the teams featured on it: The Boston Red Sox, the Chicago White Sox, and the Oakland Athletics.

Last night, the New York Yankees moved ½ game ahead of the Red Sox in the AL East, and the Red Sox are 1 game behind the Cleveland Indians in the AL Wild Card race.

The Chicago White Sox hold a 2½ game lead over the Cleveland Indians. They held something like a 10 game lead at the All-Star break, and have been playing .500 ball since then. They just lost two of three to the Indians, and are in danger of suffering the biggest collapse in baseball history.

The Oakland Athletics are 2½ games behind the Los Angeles Angels of Aneheim, and 5 games behind the Cleveland Indians in the Wild Card chase.

In a worst-case scenario for this trio of teams, the Angels, Indians, and Yankees win the divisions. That leaves the Wild Card, which one of these teams would earn. Of course, they could all still win their divisions.

The closeness of these four AL races (three divisions and the Wild Card) is exciting enough, but the fact that in the final weekend of the season the Red Sox host the Yankees, the Indians host the White Sox, and the Athletics host the Angles for a 4 game set in the second-to-last series of the season. What this means is that all of these races will probably be undecided until that last week. Outstanding.

College Athlete Insurance

I’m watching tonight’s Arkanas-USC game on Fox Sports Net, and I am aware of two things:

  • USC has a good football team, and
  • Arkansas has no business playing USC.
  • But what I really want to talk about is Matt Leinart’s decision to play his Senior year at USC. Leinart won the Heisman Trophy last year, and had he declared for the NFL draft, he almost certainly would have been the number one pick of the San Francisco 49ers.

    But he didn’t. I did a Google search for “matt leinart insurance,” and the first result was an article on Insurance NewsNet titled Premium Players; Insurance Policies Are Becoming Standard For Elite College Athletes.

    I was going to summarize the article, but instead I’ll suggest that you read it. The one fact from the article that really surprised me was that insurance policies have becomes something of a norm for “elite draft-eligible college football players.” Something much less surprising but perhaps more intriguing is that such insurance policies have increased in number significantly since Willis McGahee’s horrendous knee injury in the 2003 Fiesta Bowl — unsurprising because it was the final game of an elite college player’s senior year — intriguing because McGahee has seen none of that money, after signing a healthy contract with the Buffalo Bills. (Go Bills.)

    The article points out that because of advances in sports medicine over the past twenty or thirty years, these insurance policies may not be worth it, and McGahee is the perfect example. Carson Palmer’s father almost didn’t take out a policy on his son, but Carson asked him to do it.

    The NCAA offers injury insurance to athletes likely to be drafted highly — it does so in order to give sports agents one less reason to whisper in the ear of college athletes. It’s called Exceptional Student-Athlete Disability Insurance — ESDI. While I was thinking over this post I planned on saying some sentence like, “What does all this money mean in relation to the question of whether or not college athletes should be paid?” The answer? I don’t know. Maybe the NCAA should guarantee $1 million to every single college student who plays one of the four major sports — if an athlete suffers a career-ending injury while playing in an NCAA-sanctioned event, the NCAA pays up. I don’t expect to see that any time soon, though.

    Lance “Frenchy” Armstrong

    Lance Armstrong won the Tour de France for the seventh straight year. Seven. There is no accomplishment against which to compare this feat.

    Michael Jordan won six NBA titles in eight years, but basketball is a team sport.

    Pete Sampras won Wimbledon seven times in eight years, but there are four majors in tennis.

    Tiger won seven out of eleven majors, but that streak took only about three years, and there are four majors in golf.

    Toward the end, Lance competed in fewer events. This might be comprable to winning the Daytona 500 every year (the Superbowl of NASCAR) for seven years. Nobody’s done that.

    But did anyone hear Lance’s speech on the podium after he won? I’ve noticed this before — when Lance is among the French, his English almost sounds like it has a French accent. From what I understand he lives over there for six months out of the year, or at least he used to back when he was in more events. When in France …

    Sports Talk

    Good day for sports today.

    If you’re a fan of Tiger Woods and the New York Yankees.

    Today Tiger won the British Open, upping his major victory total to ten. Today I got thinking about how it’s special that I was old enough to appreciate Tiger when he turned pro, and I’ll be around when hes right there to break Jack Nicklaus’s record of 18 major (professional) victories.

    I have to think that Nike, American Express, and Buick executives are popping some Cris right now. Especially if they bought into the Tiger will never be the same hype.

    I then thought about how I take a genuine interest in Tiger, which is unusual for me because I often scoff at magazines like People or Us because celebrities are just people, and one celebrity is no more important than an everyday person. This got me to thinking about how I occasionally reflect on the absurdity of the media coverage of OJ Simpson’s murder trial. OJ’s just a guy, right?

    Then again, I never saw OJ play in the NFL, except for clips, which aren’t the same. I knew OJ because he covered the NFL for NBC. (I wonder if NBC will bring him back for their new Sunday night package.) But I was never in OJ’s corner. I never rooted for him. But if Tiger were in that position? Yeah, I’d root for him.

    In other news, Al Leiter returned from the dead today. Last week the Florida Marlins designated him for assignment along with his 3-7 record and 6.64 ERA this season. Yesterday the Yankees acquired Leiter from the Marlins for a player to be named later and cash roughly equivalent to the remainder of Leiter’s pay for this season. (I am borrowing heavily from ESPN.com’s story on the game, here.) Leiter, a former Yankee, made his first start for the Bombers in 16 years and 82 days, breaking Babe Ruth’s record for time between starts. So what does Leiter do? He pitches 6⅓ innings, allows one run, and strikes out a season high eight batters. Crazy.

    Oh, and the Yankees pulled to within a half game of the Red Stinx.

    Finally, have you noticed that ESPN.com offers many of its articles in paginated view, but gives you the option to click on a single page view? What is the point of the multiple page format? At first I thought it was so pages will load faster over a slow connection, but loading three pages worth of graphics has got to take longer than loading one page worth. I always click the single page view link. Always. ESPN.com should provide users with a cookie to set preference on this.

    And as long as I’m on the subject of article format preference cookies … every web site in the world should look at Wired News and emulate the system it uses for font size selection. The single biggest drawback of a high resolution display is that all the fonts get small, and you either squint or sit closer. With sites like Wired News, you can literally sit back and relax.

    Is Anybody Else Tired of Chris Berman?

    The Home Run Derby was on last night. Chris Berman was the master of ceremonies and the host. Joe Morgan was the co-host. Is anybody else tired of Chris Berman? I liked his schtick for the first few years, but it’s almost like he can’t say a normal sentence anymore. It’s all just “BACK BACK BACK!” and “CURTIS MY FAVORITE MARTIN!”

    When I turned on the show tonight I actually had one of those, “oh God, not …” moments when I heard Berman’s voice. Can’t they just station him permanently on the Deuce?

    @DanielPremo

    • @marklisanti Did you do Mad Men Power Rankings for seasons 1 and 2? If so, where are they? 5 hrs ago
    • Did Mick Jagger drop an S-bomb on SNL? 1 day ago
    • Is this SEC - Big 12 bowl a political play to downplay the Big Ten/Pac 12 Rose Bowl "we're more important than everybody else" chip? 3 days ago
    • @meyerweb Will we have to use the viewport meta tag to control how websites display on HiDPI Macs? 3 days ago
    • @JustinMcElroy Curt Schilling likes the tea party?! This guy's deuchebag resume is huge. 3 days ago
    • I'm seeing multiple "OMG now server queues!" posts about Diablo, but aren't servers down for maintenance right now? 6 days ago
    • @Flickr Can I break my Flickr account out of my Yahoo account? 6 days ago
    • @jaysonst @mikeandmike A-rod and Pujols? 6 days ago
    • More updates...